<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: For the Next Debate&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.swarthmore.edu/burke/2008/04/17/for-the-next-debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.swarthmore.edu/burke/2008/04/17/for-the-next-debate/</link>
	<description>Culture, Politics, Academia and Other Shiny Objects</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:26:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joey Headset</title>
		<link>http://blogs.swarthmore.edu/burke/2008/04/17/for-the-next-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-5206</link>
		<dc:creator>Joey Headset</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 08:44:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogs.swarthmore.edu/burke/?p=555#comment-5206</guid>
		<description>The Weather Underground is cool and all, but I prefer getting my weather directly from the national weather service.

Also, re: the SLA.  Did they ever manage to liberate Symbia?

[plug] LISTEN TO MY PODCAST [/plug]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Weather Underground is cool and all, but I prefer getting my weather directly from the national weather service.</p>
<p>Also, re: the SLA.  Did they ever manage to liberate Symbia?</p>
<p>[plug] LISTEN TO MY PODCAST [/plug]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DougLathrop</title>
		<link>http://blogs.swarthmore.edu/burke/2008/04/17/for-the-next-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-5205</link>
		<dc:creator>DougLathrop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 05:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogs.swarthmore.edu/burke/?p=555#comment-5205</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Alternatively, I’d settle for various episodes of Boomer Generational Trauma going the fuck away for a couple of decades.&lt;/i&gt;

You should know better by now, Tim. Boomer Generational Trauma is never going away. Boomers are the Most Important Generation in the History of Humankind and every last collective fart of theirs is going to keep stinking up the air long after the last Boomer is dead and buried/cremated/cryogenically frozen.

But seriously, wasn&#039;t Barack Obama in third grade when the Weather Underground were active? I watched the Patti Hearst saga on TV at age 10 and an acquaintance of mine once belonged to a church whose pastor was the father of an SLA member. I guess that means I can never be President.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Alternatively, I’d settle for various episodes of Boomer Generational Trauma going the fuck away for a couple of decades.</i></p>
<p>You should know better by now, Tim. Boomer Generational Trauma is never going away. Boomers are the Most Important Generation in the History of Humankind and every last collective fart of theirs is going to keep stinking up the air long after the last Boomer is dead and buried/cremated/cryogenically frozen.</p>
<p>But seriously, wasn&#8217;t Barack Obama in third grade when the Weather Underground were active? I watched the Patti Hearst saga on TV at age 10 and an acquaintance of mine once belonged to a church whose pastor was the father of an SLA member. I guess that means I can never be President.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hestal</title>
		<link>http://blogs.swarthmore.edu/burke/2008/04/17/for-the-next-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-5204</link>
		<dc:creator>hestal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 10:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogs.swarthmore.edu/burke/?p=555#comment-5204</guid>
		<description>I agree with fridaykr&#039;s comment.

I think the reason for this behavior is that politicians worship the God of Election/Reelection.  Fridaykr&#039;s rules are designed to prevent missteps, not to enlighten the electorate or even to learn from them.  This is an old characteristic of the two-party system and it became even worse during the 1972 campaign as television began to play a larger, more effective role.  Now the interplay between the voters and the candidates is highly ritualized taking the form of visits to diners, bbq&#039;s etc.  

And our election system is getting more burdensome and less trustworthy.  The day is not far off when pollsters will add a new parameter to their present factors of sample size, date taken, margin of error, and level of confidence: they will make their projections but qualify them with an estimate of the number of votes cast that will not be counted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with fridaykr&#8217;s comment.</p>
<p>I think the reason for this behavior is that politicians worship the God of Election/Reelection.  Fridaykr&#8217;s rules are designed to prevent missteps, not to enlighten the electorate or even to learn from them.  This is an old characteristic of the two-party system and it became even worse during the 1972 campaign as television began to play a larger, more effective role.  Now the interplay between the voters and the candidates is highly ritualized taking the form of visits to diners, bbq&#8217;s etc.  </p>
<p>And our election system is getting more burdensome and less trustworthy.  The day is not far off when pollsters will add a new parameter to their present factors of sample size, date taken, margin of error, and level of confidence: they will make their projections but qualify them with an estimate of the number of votes cast that will not be counted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: back40</title>
		<link>http://blogs.swarthmore.edu/burke/2008/04/17/for-the-next-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-5203</link>
		<dc:creator>back40</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 04:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogs.swarthmore.edu/burke/?p=555#comment-5203</guid>
		<description>I read that this debate had more television viewers than others. The journalists who asked the questions did well for themselves, and their audience was captivated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read that this debate had more television viewers than others. The journalists who asked the questions did well for themselves, and their audience was captivated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fridaykr</title>
		<link>http://blogs.swarthmore.edu/burke/2008/04/17/for-the-next-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-5202</link>
		<dc:creator>fridaykr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 17:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogs.swarthmore.edu/burke/?p=555#comment-5202</guid>
		<description>I am embarrassed by the way we have let mainstream political discourse -as evidenced by the debate questions and their underlying premises --become utterly jejune. If Obama seemed annoyed and fatigued during the last debate, and I agree with the observers who thought that he did, it may be because it is finally dawning on him that he has failed in his quixotic attempt to have an intelligent conversation with the electorate and bypass the commentators who claim to represent the electorate&#039;s interests.

Obama should know by now that the rules of American political discourse are fairly straightforward, if limiting: don&#039;t be too direct in expressing uncomfortable truths, don&#039;t ask for personal sacrifice, turn any infelicitous turn of phrase into a metonym for broad policy decisions, substitute personal attributes for competency in governance, and above all, don&#039;t raise taxes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am embarrassed by the way we have let mainstream political discourse -as evidenced by the debate questions and their underlying premises &#8211;become utterly jejune. If Obama seemed annoyed and fatigued during the last debate, and I agree with the observers who thought that he did, it may be because it is finally dawning on him that he has failed in his quixotic attempt to have an intelligent conversation with the electorate and bypass the commentators who claim to represent the electorate&#8217;s interests.</p>
<p>Obama should know by now that the rules of American political discourse are fairly straightforward, if limiting: don&#8217;t be too direct in expressing uncomfortable truths, don&#8217;t ask for personal sacrifice, turn any infelicitous turn of phrase into a metonym for broad policy decisions, substitute personal attributes for competency in governance, and above all, don&#8217;t raise taxes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: withywindle</title>
		<link>http://blogs.swarthmore.edu/burke/2008/04/17/for-the-next-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-5200</link>
		<dc:creator>withywindle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 15:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogs.swarthmore.edu/burke/?p=555#comment-5200</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not as if we want a president to care about history.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not as if we want a president to care about history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: back40</title>
		<link>http://blogs.swarthmore.edu/burke/2008/04/17/for-the-next-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-5198</link>
		<dc:creator>back40</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 18:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogs.swarthmore.edu/burke/?p=555#comment-5198</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s neural sludge. Old timers get that way. Did I ever tell about the time . . . oh, I did?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s neural sludge. Old timers get that way. Did I ever tell about the time . . . oh, I did?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

